Four Reasons Why Not to Use Chandler 1.0
Monday, August 11th, 2008As a dedicated software adventurer, Chandler has been on my radar for a very long time. Since 1.0 came out today, I thought I might give it a go.
What Chandler is: a project that hopes to sync with great services (gmail, outlook, etc) and is therefore quite welcome.
What Chandler is not: functional or useful
Ouch! I am quite sorry to give such a review of this project. I know what it takes to pull something like this off, and how much Mitch Kapor’s heart has been poured into it. Let’s hope this isn’t a pattern for later releases of Chandler.
Four Reasons why Chandler 1.0 is found wanting
1. It doesn’t do anything that I need
Sure, it syncs my to-do’s and calendar with other stuff, but does that matter when the to-do’s aren’t useful, and calendar has nothing new to offer? In other words, who wants to sync something they don’t really don’t need? Sync a mess at home, and it will appear at work also!
2. Tasks are a mess
Chandler is supposed to follow the GTD paradigm. The problem is it just uses the most minimal implementation possible. So if you want to mark something beyond just now/later/done, you have to schedule it on the calendar. This poses a few problems. Mainly, there is no abstraction, which is really the heart of GTD, i.e. “don’t stress over that now, you can only do one thing at a time”.
Thankfully, they do have “note”(the universal item in Chandler) categories. You can’t even drag/arrange tasks. Their idea of abstraction is a star. Your note can have it, or not. Well, after you mark a dozen of those, they start to loose their meaning.
With so much competition in the tasking arena, Chandler is certainly nothing to get excited about.
3. No contacts
Really, this program wants to be a PIM (personal information manager). It’s my opinion that nothing is really going to take over this market until they take a truly SMART comprehensive view of PIM. There have been many brave attempts, but since there is a large gap between great ideas and solid implementation, we probably have to wait for a couple more years before something killer comes along.
So how are you supposed to link a to-do to a contact to a calendar entry? You can’t right now. I bet you a nickel it’s in their plans, but that doesn’t help us today.
4. Memory Muncher
The Python runtime jumped to 140 mb after some very average usage in Chandler. Python has its own memory management, but how well will it do under heavy usage? Remember Python on the desktop isn’t a terribly popular scenario, and Chandler could find themselves with low level programming they aren’t ready to handle. But, that is a risk I bet they have wagered well. You have to take risks to move ahead in the tech world.
Really, I do hate to be so down on fellow entrepreneurs and developers. Truly, I wish them the best. Please, own this category! Until then, I am sticking with ToDoList and a medley of other apps. My prediction is that Google will be the first to confront the ugly monster that is PIM with poise.
+ update : I found Thinking Rock, and so far, I really love it. It will probably take the place of ToDoList.
